Tag frequency control

ABSTRACT

A communication system comprising one or more transceiver units of a first type and one or more transceiver units of a second type capable of communicating with the transceiver units of the first type; each transceiver unit of the first type comprising: a frequency comparison unit for comparing the frequency of a signal received from a transceiver unit of the second type with a reference frequency; a feedback signal generator for generating a feedback signal dependent on the result of that comparison; and a transmitter for transmitting that signal to the transceiver unit of the second type; and each transceiver unit of the second type comprising: a local frequency reference unit on which the frequency of signals transmitted by it are dependent; and a frequency adjustment unit for receiving the feedback signal and adjusting the local frequency reference unit in dependence on the feedback signal.

CROSS REFERENCE OF RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120(e) of thefiling date of non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 11/569,891filed May 3, 2007, which is a national phase of PCT/GB2005/002154 filedMay 31, 2005, and designating the United States, the respectivedisclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to frequency control in a communication system,especially a radio communication system.

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

A number of communication systems have been proposed for allowing thelocation of objects to be determined. Typically, a transmitter isco-located with an object whose location is to be determined. Signalsfrom the transmitters are received by receivers which are installed atknown locations. By measuring one or more characteristics of thecommunications between the transmitters and receivers the locations ofthe transmitters relative to the receivers can be estimated. In somesystems the direction of communication is reversed: the transmitters areinstalled at fixed locations and the receivers are co-located with theobjects. In others fixed transceivers are installed at the fixedlocations and mobile transceivers are co-located with the objects, andbidirectional communication between the fixed and the mobiletransceivers is possible. It is possible for the transmitter and thereceivers to move, provided one set do so in a predictable way. Forinstance in the Global Positioning System (GPS) the locations of thesatellite transmitters varies in a way that is known to the receivers.

When the objects that are to be located are within buildings there canbe severe multipath effects which can hinder the accurate determinationof the objects' locations. Because of this, ultra-wideband (UWB) radiois particularly promising for object positioning systems. By usingshort-pulse electromagnetic signals, UWB radio avoids many of theproblems associated with conventional in-building radio positioningtechnology.

UWB communications systems using trains of pulses are discussed in thefollowing papers: Multiple Access with Time-Hopping Impulse Modulation,R. A. Scholtz Invited Paper, IEEE MILCOM'93, Boston, Mass., Oct. 11-14,1993 (http://www.timedomain.com/Files/downloads/techpapers/Sholtz.pdf);PulsON Technology Overview, A. Petroff and P. Withington, Time DomainCorporation.(http://www.timedomain.com/Files/downloads/techpapers/PulsONOverview7_01.pdf).

Numerous types of UWB radio systems exist. Several of them involvereceivers at known locations that receive trains of low-power radiopulses sent by transmitters which are each co-located with an objectwhose location is to be determined. The receivers then integrate theenergy in several pulses to recover the incoming signal. A difficulty ofsuch systems is that there must be very tight synchronisation betweenthe transmitters and the receivers since if the receiver is to recoverthe maximum incoming signal energy (and hence recover any incoming datawith maximum reliability) its expected frequency of pulse arrival mustmatch exactly the transmitter's frequency of pulse dispatch. This isillustrated in FIG. 1. FIG. 1 illustrates a train of pulses being sentfrom a transmitter to a receiver. If the received pulses are sampled atthe correct frequency synchronisation then a strong impulse is detected.If the received pulses are sampled at an offset frequencysynchronisation then a weak impulse is detected. Similar considerationsapply in fields other than UWB radio systems.

In a typical UWB locationing system in which transmitters (tags) arelocated at the objects to be located and receivers (base stations) areinstalled at known locations, it could be anticipated that the clockscontrolling the tag and base station must generate the same frequency toan accuracy of plus or minus around 1 ppm (parts-per-million) forreasonable performance. This figure would be a total frequency errorbudget taking both ends of the link into account. Thus, for example, ifthe base station had a theoretically perfect clock which operatedexactly at the nominal pulse repetition frequency (PRF), the clocks onthe tag could drift +/−1 ppm in frequency from the nominal PRF.Alternatively, base station clocks and tag clocks could both bepermitted to drift up to +/−0.5 ppm from the nominal clock frequency,the worst case then being when a tag with a +0.5 ppm clock iscommunicating with a base station with a −0.5 ppm clock, or when a tagwith a −0.5 ppm clock is communicating with a base station with a +0.5ppm clock, but even these cases are within the anticipated frequencyerror budget.

Tags and base stations will typically have an on-board frequencyreference oscillator, normally a quartz oscillator, acting as a clockfor its transmissions and its reception operations. The accuracy of suchan oscillator is generally affected by a number of factors:

-   -   initial manufacturing tolerance    -   manufacturing effects (e.g. extreme temperature during        soldering)    -   temperature during operation    -   crystal ageing

Some of these effects can be compensated for after the tag and basestation devices have been manufactured. Each device can be compared witha ‘known, good’ frequency reference, and its frequency can then be tuned(e.g. by mechanical or electrical trimming) to bring it intosynchronisation with the reference. This method can be used tocompensate for any initial offset or any fixed offset introduced duringmanufacture. However, it cannot compensate for changes that occur duringoperation of the device, for example temperature-related effects andcrystal ageing.

UWB positioning links differ from many standard communications linksbecause they are typically is extremely sensitive to tag-infrastructurefrequency offsets, which must be kept very small (typically less than ˜1ppm) in order for the link to be established at all. Implementation ofsuch systems therefore normally demands tag and infrastructure frequencyreferences that are not greatly affected by temperature. As a result,the long-term (ageing) drift of the crystal is more problematic than theshort-term (temperature) drift.

It might be thought that after compensating for initial fixed offsets,one could employ crystal references that did not age significantly, andthat were relatively insensitive to changes in ambient temperature.However, in a practical commercial system power and cost constraintsmean that the quality of oscillator that can be used is severelylimited. In most applications the best oscillators that can be used fortags are temperature-compensated crystal oscillators (TCXOs), and forbase stations oven compensated crystal oscillators (OCXOs). TCXOstypically have a best accuracy over temperature (in the range from 0 to50° C.) of around +/−0.3 ppm, although +/−0.5 ppm TCXOs aresignificantly cheaper. A +/−0.3 ppm TCXO on base stations and a +/−0.5ppm TCXO on the tags, both tuned after manufacture, would initiallysatisfy the +/−1 ppm total frequency budget. OCXOs are more expensiveand power hungry, but have an accuracy over temperature of better than+/−0.1 ppm, and if installed at base stations would give more margin onthe frequency budget.

However, ageing effects will be expected to change the frequency of aTCXO over the first year by +/−1 ppm, and over three years the frequencyshift can be up to +/−3 ppm. An OCXO will be expected to age by up to+/−0.5 ppm per year. It therefore appears that in order to make such acommunication system work over long periods of time without highmaintenance overheads or excessively extensive components it will benecessary to compensate for the effects of crystal ageing in the tagsand base stations.

Frequency control techniques are well-known in traditional radiocommunications systems. In particular, some narrowband FM systemsprovide an automatic frequency control (AFC) mechanism to allow areceiver to modify its operating frequency to match a transmitter whichmay have drifted off-centre. The Chipcon CC1020 FM transceivermanufactured by Chipcon AS (www.chipcon.com) is an example of a radiocommunications device with this capability. However, frequencyadjustment schemes of this type are generally intended to compensate forshort-term drift due to temperature changes, and so the basic mechanismsnormally provide only for frequency optimisation of a link that hasalready been established. In contrast, the present invention relates totechniques suitable for use in establishing new links. According topreferred aspects of the present invention, measurements taken whilstthat link is in operation can then be used to compute compensationvalues which will be stored and used for the next communication attempt.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention aims to at least partially address the need forproviding synchronisation between transmitter and receiver, especiallyin situations where such synchronisation is needed for linkestablishment, and especially for UWB radio systems.

According to the present invention there is provided a communicationsystem comprising one or more transceiver units of a first type and oneor more transceiver units of a second type capable of communicating withthe transceiver units of the first type; each transceiver unit of thefirst type comprising: a frequency comparison unit for comparing thefrequency of a signal received from a transceiver unit of the secondtype with a reference frequency; a feedback signal generator forgenerating a feedback signal dependent on the result of that comparison;and a transmitter for transmitting that signal to the transceiver unitof the second type; and each transceiver unit of the second typecomprising: a local frequency reference unit on which the frequency ofsignals transmitted by it are dependent; and a frequency adjustment unitfor receiving the feedback signal and adjusting the local frequencyreference unit in dependence on the feedback signal.

Preferably each transceiver unit of the first type is arranged to,during a communication session with a transceiver unit of the secondtype, repeatedly perform the said comparison, generate a feedback signalas a result of that comparison and transmit that signal to the saidtransceiver unit of the second type.

Preferably the frequency adjustment unit comprises a memory and astorage unit for storing in the memory adjustment data dependent on thefeedback signal, and is arranged to adjust the local frequency referenceunit in dependence on the adjustment data.

Preferably the memory is arranged to store the adjustment data for useafter the completion of a communication session with a transceiver unitof the first type.

Preferably the communication system comprises at least one transceiverunit of a third type with which the transceivers of the second type arecapable of communicating; and a database accessible to the transceiverunits of the first type and the transceiver units of the third type; andwherein: the transceiver units of the first type are arranged to, oncomparing the frequency of a signal received from a transceiver unit ofthe second type with the reference frequency, store in the database anindication of the result of that comparison together with an identity ofthat transceiver unit of the second type; and each transceiver unit ofthe third type comprises: a local frequency reference unit on which theoperating frequency of that transceiver unit is dependent; and afrequency adjustment unit for, on receiving a signal from a transceiverunit of the second type for which the database holds an indication ofthe result of a comparison, comparing the frequency of that signal withthe frequency of the respective local frequency reference unit andadjusting the frequency reference unit in accordance with thatcomparison.

The frequency adjustment unit of the transceiver unit of the third typemay be arranged to perform the said adjustment only if the indicationheld in the database meets at least one further criterion, for exampleif the indication is stored together with a record that indicates thatthe transceiver unit of the second type for which the indication is heldhas had its reference frequency updated within a predetermined timeperiod.

The feedback signal generator may be arranged to generate the feedbacksignal dependent on the result of a plurality of comparisons of thefrequency of a signal received from the transceiver unit of the secondtype with the reference frequency. The said comparisons are suitablyperformed over a period of at least 24 hours, most preferably a periodthat is an integer multiple of 24 hours.

According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided acommunication system comprising: one or more transceiver units of afirst type; a data store accessible to the or each transceiver unit ofthe first type; two or more transceiver units of a second type, thetransceiver units of a second type being capable of communicating withthe transceiver units of the first type, and each transceiver unit ofthe second type comprising a local frequency reference unit on which thefrequency of signals transmitted by it are dependent; wherein: at leastone transceiver unit of the first type comprises a frequency comparisonunit for comparing the frequency of a signal received from a transceiverunit of the second type with a reference frequency, and a feedback datastorage unit for storing in the data store feedback data representativeof the result of that comparison in respect of that transceiver unit ofthe second type; and the or each transceiver unit of the first typecomprises a frequency adjustment unit for adjusting the transmit and/orreceive frequency of the transceiver unit of the first type forcommunication with one of the transceiver units of the second type inaccordance with feedback data stored in respect of that transceiver unitof the second type.

The or each transceiver unit of the first type may be arranged tocommunicate with a single one of the transceiver units of the secondtype at any one time.

According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided acommunication system comprising: one or more transceiver units of afirst type; two or more transceiver units of a second type, thetransceiver units of a second type being capable of communicating withthe transceiver units of the first type, and each transceiver unit ofthe second type comprising a local frequency reference unit on which thefrequency of signals transmitted by it are dependent; wherein at leastone transceiver unit of the first type comprises: a frequency comparisonunit for comparing the frequency of signals received from transceiverunits of the second type with a reference frequency and forming anoffset signal representative of the average offset between the frequencyof the received signals and the reference frequency; a frequencyadjustment unit for adjusting the reference frequency in accordance withthe offset signal.

Preferably each transceiver unit of the first and third types is a basestation.

Preferably each transceiver unit of the second type is an identificationunit.

Preferably each transceiver unit of the second type has a uniqueidentity within the system. Preferably each transceiver unit of thesecond type is a mobile transceiver.

Preferably each transceiver unit of the second type is a radio tag.Preferably each transceiver unit of the second type comprises a powersource.

Preferably the system is a locationing system and is capable ofdetermining the location of a transceiver unit of the second typerelative to the or each transceiver unit of the first type.

Preferably communication between the transceiver units of the first typeand the transceiver units of the second system is by ultrawidebandradio.

Preferably the communication system is such that each transceiver unitof the second type can establish communication with each transceiverunit of the first type only if the operating frequencies of thosetransceiver units are synchronised to better than 2 ppm.

Preferably the or each local frequency reference unit is an oscillatorand the or each frequency adjustment unit is capable of altering theoscillation frequency of the oscillator.

According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided amethod of adjusting a local frequency reference of a transceiver unit ina communication system comprising one or more transceiver units of afirst type and one or more transceiver units of a second type capable ofcommunicating with the transceiver units of the first type; the methodcomprising: comparing the frequency of a signal received from atransceiver unit of the second type with a reference frequency;generating a feedback signal dependent on the result of that comparison;transmitting that signal to the transceiver unit of the second type; andat the transceiver unit of the second type: receiving the feedbacksignal; and adjusting a local frequency reference unit on which thefrequency of signals transmitted by the transceiver unit of the secondtype are dependent in dependence on the feedback signal.

According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided amethod for adjusting the transmit and/or receive frequency of atransceiver unit in a communication system comprising one or moretransceiver units of a first type, the transceiver units of a secondtype being capable of communicating with the transceiver units of thefirst type; the method comprising: comparing the frequency of a signalreceived by a transceiver of the first type from a transceiver unit ofthe second type with a reference frequency; storing feedback datarepresentative of the result of that comparison in respect of thattransceiver unit of the second type; and adjusting the transmit and/orreceive frequency of the transceiver unit of the first type forcommunication with one of the transceiver units of the second type inaccordance with feedback data stored in respect of that transceiver unitof the second type.

According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided amethod for adjusting a reference frequency of a transceiver unit in acommunication system comprising one or more transceiver units of a firsttype, and two or more transceiver units of a second type, thetransceiver units of the second type being capable of communicating withthe transceiver units of the first type, each transceiver unit of thesecond type comprising a local frequency reference unit on which thefrequency of signals transmitted by it are dependent; the methodcomprising: comparing the frequency of signals received from transceiverunits of the second type with a reference frequency; forming an offsetsignal representative of the average offset between the frequency of thereceived signals and the reference frequency; and adjusting thereference frequency in accordance with the offset signal.

According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided acommunications system comprising: one or more transceivers of a firsttype; a database accessible to the transceiver units of the first type;one or more transceiver units of a second type, the transceiver units ofa second type being capable of communicating with the transceiver unitsof the first type, and each transceiver unit of the second typecomprising a local frequency reference unit on which the frequency ofsignals transmitted by it are dependent; wherein at least two of thetransceiver units of the first type comprise: a local frequencyreference unit; a frequency comparison unit for comparing the frequencyof signals received from a transceiver unit of the second type with thelocal frequency reference and storing an offset signal based on thatcomparison in the database; and a processing unit capable of accessingthe database and, for each transceiver of the second type, forming asignal representative of the average of the offset signals stored in thedatabase for that transceiver and communicating that offset signal tothat transceiver.

The communication system preferably comprises a number of mobiletransceiver units that can communicate with a base unit. The system maybe capable of determining the location of the tags by means ofcommunications between the mobile transceiver units and the basestation. The mobile transceiver units may be tags that can be used totag objects.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will now be described by way of example withreference to the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 illustrates the effect of frequency synchronisation on recoveryof a received signal;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a radio location system;

FIG. 3 shows the general architecture of a base station;

FIG. 4 shows the general architecture of a tag;

FIG. 5 illustrates “continuous” frequency compensation via a feedbackloop;

FIG. 6 illustrates “instantaneous” frequency compensation; and

FIG. 7 illustrates frequency compensation using tags to transferaccurate references.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a radio location system. The systemcomprises a set of base stations 1, which are fixed in place at knownlocations. The base stations are capable of receiving signalstransmitted by tags 2, which are mobile and are in this example eachattached to a respective object 6 whose location is to be found by meansof the system. The signals received by the base stations are passed to aprocessing unit 3 which may be a suitably programmed computer. Theprocessing unit processes the signals in a manner to be described belowin order to determine the location of any selected tag. The processingunit includes a central database 4. This can be used as described belowfor assisting synchronisation of the system.

A user of the system can interrogate the processing unit by means of aterminal 5 so as to identify a tag to the processing unit, therebycausing the processing unit to determine that tag's location and totransmit to the terminal 5 the location of the tag for display at theterminal. The location data could, of course, be used in other ways—forinstance the processing unit 3 could continuously monitor the locationsof the tags and store their locations for later analysis.

FIG. 3 shows the general architecture of a base station. The basestation 1 of FIG. 3 includes an antenna 11 connected to a transceiverunit 12. The transceiver unit generates radio frequency signals underthe control of a control unit 13 for transmission by the antenna 11, andprocesses signals received by the antenna to generate resulting basebandsignals that are passed to the control unit for baseband processing. Thecontrol unit 13 is connected via an interface unit 14 to an externallink 17. The base station can communicate via the externalinfrastructure link with other elements of the infrastructure equipment,such as other base stations or the processing unit 3. A clock 16controls the operating frequency of the transmissions of the basestation and the frequency at which incoming signals are decoded. Thebase station of FIG. 3 has a clock adjustment controller 15 whichprovides input to the clock under the control of the control unit 13 soas to adjust the operating frequency of the clock.

FIG. 4 shows the general architecture of a tag. The tag 2 of FIG. 4includes an antenna 21 connected to a transceiver unit 22. Thetransceiver unit generates radio frequency signals under the control ofa control unit 23 for transmission by the antenna 21, and processessignals received by the antenna to generate resulting baseband signalsthat are passed to the control unit for baseband processing. A clock 25controls the operating frequency of the transmissions of the tag and thefrequency at which incoming signals are decoded. The tag of FIG. 3 has aclock adjustment controller 24 which provides input to the clock underthe control of the control unit 23 so as to adjust the operatingfrequency of the clock. A battery 26 powers the tag.

As will be discussed in more detail below, it is not necessary for bothbase stations and tags to have the capability of ongoing clock frequencyadjustment. Therefore, the clock adjustment controllers 15, 24 need notbe present in both the base station and the tags.

Ultrawideband (UWB) radio systems structured as shown in FIGS. 2 to 4can determine the positions of objects to within a few tens ofcentimetres. When installed in a building, the tags 2 attached toobjects 6 emit UWB positioning signals which are picked up by a networkof base stations 1 around the building. It is preferred that telemetryand control data can be passed between the tags and the base stations,preferably bidirectionally. This may be done by providing for a controlradio channel that can be supported by the base station and taghardware, for example employing a conventional radio link. The telemetryand/or control data may be passed by any suitable form of remotesignalling. The base stations can also preferably communicate with eachother and with the processing unit 3 by means of a wired or wirelessinfrastructure-side data interface, for example connections 7 in FIG. 1and link 17 in FIG. 2. These links may be direct or via a network, forexample a packet-switched network.

Numerous communication methods may be used. In one exemplaryimplementation of the system, tags and basestations communicate controldata over a conventional radio channel. The coverage area of the systemis divided into cells—within each cell, one basestation communicatesbidirectionally with tags in that cell via a timeslotted radio protocol.Communications channels between tags and basestations in neighbouringcells are separated using frequency-division multiplexing.

Each communication channel timeslot includes a ‘downlink’ period inwhich the basestation can send messages to tags in that cell, followedby one or more ‘uplink’ periods in which tags can send information backto the basestation. Tags attempting to send information back to thebasestation choose to transmit information in one uplink period chosenat random—in this way, if multiple tags attempt to send information backto the basestation in the same timeslot, there is a reasonableprobability that at least one of them will succeed without interferingwith or being interfered by another transmitting tag (assuming that thenumber of available uplink periods is greater than the number of tagsattempting to transmit data in that timeslot). Even if a tag's signal isinterfered by another tag in one period, eventually it will succeed in alater period.

In this implementation, each cell has an associated radio positioningchannel, which is distinguished from that of neighbouring cells byvirtue of a different characteristic pulse repetition frequency (PRF).Within each cell, the channel is shared between tags using a timeslottedprotocol. Note that in this implementation the timeslots on thepositioning channel need not be exactly aligned with those on thecommunications channel, but there is a one-to-one correspondence betweencommunications and positioning timeslots. A single tag transmits signalson the positioning channel during a particular timeslot—the tag isselected by the basestation and identified in the message transmittedduring the downlink period of the associated communications channeltimeslot (which must have been received before the start of thispositioning timeslot). Note that it is not necessary for the positioningsignal to convey any information regarding the identity of the tag—thiscan be deduced by the basestation, which knows which tag transmittedpositioning signals in which timeslot.

Other communications and positioning protocols may be used to implementthe system.

As indicated above, there is a need for frequency synchronisationbetween the base stations and the tags: i.e. for the operatingfrequencies of the base stations and the tags to be maintained the sameas each other to within a preferred tolerance. This may conveniently beachieved by adjustment of the reference frequencies at one or both ends.The methods of frequency synchronisation described herein employ afrequency measurement and control feedback loop between the tags and theinfrastructure (the base stations). Based on the feedback over this loopthe reference frequencies at either or both the tag and theinfrastructure ends of the UWB link can be “pulled” (adjusted) to bringboth ends into closer frequency synchronisation. The frequency of atypical TCXO can be pulled by up to +/−5 ppm and a typical OCXO by up to+/−1 ppm by electronic adjustment during operation: for example byapplying a suitable voltage at a control pin. Therefore, if tags andbase stations are equipped with a digital-to-analog converter by meansof which such a suitable voltage can be generated under digital control,it is possible to adjust their frequency references in steps of betterthan 0.04 ppm (=10 ppm/256, for a TCXO). Such an D-to-A converter couldserve as the or part of the frequency controller 15 or 24.

It is necessary to determine the degree to which each individualfrequency reference (e.g. clock 16, 25) should be pulled, and in whatdirection. The pulse repetition frequency or carrier frequency on whicha device in the system transmits is representative of the device'scurrent reference frequency. A device receiving such transmitted signalscan therefore analyse the received signals, determine the PRF or carrierfrequency and therefore the reference frequency that it represents, andcompare that with its own reference frequency. In some embodiments oneor more other characteristics of the signal may be individually orcollectively representative of the reference frequency. For example, thetransmission scheme may be such that the phase of the signal relative toa reference clock and/or the amplitude of the signal may be indicativeof the reference frequency. In an example in which the PRF isrepresentative of the reference frequency and in which tags transmit toreceiving base stations, as part of the process of locating a tag thesystem may measure the precise value of the tag PRF (accurate to around0.02 ppm), and can derive the current frequency value of the referenceused by the tag relative to the local base station reference. Thisinformation can then be used in a number of ways to achieve frequencycontrol within the system. These ways will be described below.

1. “Continuous” Frequency Compensation Via a Feedback Loop

If the base station frequency reference is good relative to the timeperiod over which the system is to work (typically, say, an OCXO or alow-ageing TCXO), any offset in the measured tag PRF can reasonably beattributed to ageing of the tag frequency reference. The base stationcan subsequently communicate with the tag over a conventional wirelesslink, and inform it of the direction and degree to which its localfrequency reference should be adjusted for continued good performance,as shown below.

As illustrated FIG. 2, all base stations in the system are generallylinked together via a communications system (typically a wired network),and so the base station(s) that determine the correction factor for thetag frequency reference need not be the one(s) which communicate thatinformation to the tag over the conventional wireless link.

In this system, the feedback loop can be operated repeatedly over timeto compensate to at least some extent the tag frequency references forthe ageing that they have undergone. In this sense, the frequencycompensation of this method can be regarded as being “continuous”. Thecompensation may occur periodically or occasionally, but is repeatedsufficiently often that the tag frequency reference can be kept withinthe desired bounds.

The frequency at which updates would be performed would depend onfactors such as the exact characteristics of the frequency references(e.g. crystals, TCXO, OCXO) being used, the exact requirements of thepositioning system in terms of frequency accuracy. the accuracy to whichthe tag frequency reference could be determined during remotemeasurement by the basestation, and the properties of any filter (e.g.an averaging filter) which was to be applied to stored measurements ofthe tag frequency.

For the purposes of illustration, consider a system which had a totalfrequency error budget of 1 ppm, a particularly good base stationfrequency reference (so any error can be attributed to the tag frequencyreference), maximum crystal ageing of +/−1 ppm per year, frequency errormeasurement accuracy of +/−0.25 ppm at the basestation, and no filteringof error measurements at the base station.

Frequency adjustments should be made at the tag more often than once ayear, because the tag's frequency reference could drift beyond thelimits of system operation within that time. Also, due to the limitedmeasurement accuracy of the basestation it is not feasible to reliablyidentify (without filtering) any change in the tag frequency referencethat might take place in less than three months. In these circumstances,therefore, it might be appropriate to update the calibration of the tagfrequency reference a few times per year. In this particular situation,more frequent updates to the tag frequency reference would serve littlepurpose, but would not be detrimental to system operation. It should benoted, however, that if a complex filtering algorithm incorporatingfeedback were used in the system, for example by employing a combinationof the techniques described herein, updates that were too frequent mightcause instability (because any changes that appeared to take place wouldmost likely be due to measurement error at the basestation rather thanreal changes in the tag frequency reference).

Note that it may be advantageous for base stations(s) to make theirassessment of ageing of a particular tag frequency reference on thebasis of a set of PRF measurements taken over a period of time. By usingmultiple measurements, it is possible to filter out the effects ofindividual readings which may not accurately represent ageing in the tagfrequency reference. For example, as a tag is moved around, itstemperature may vary significantly, and this temperature change willcause some variation of the tag PRF. If it is assumed that the tag willbe exposed to a variety of temperature regimes, one can average severalPRF measurements taken over time to help determine the true extent oftag frequency reference ageing, without temperature changes influencingthe result. Such readings are suitably separated by periods of, forexample, several minutes to several hours.

The period over which frequency readings should be taken to minimise theeffects of temperature variations depends on the expected frequency withwhich tags will be exposed to different temperature regimes. One commonsituation might be temperature variations due to insolation—a tag placedon a windowsill would experience a range of different temperaturesduring the day. By taking, say, ten readings over a 24 hour period, thesystem could reliably determine the true extent of tag crystal ageingindependent of the changes in tag operating frequency due to diurnalchanges.

This scheme is illustrated in FIG. 5.

2. “Instantaneous” Frequency Compensation

Rather than attempt to adjust the tag frequency reference, the basestation frequency reference could be varied. This approach would havethe benefits that the tags, for which cost and size are importantfactors, would need fewer components (for instance tags would not need aD-to-A converter for adjusting the oscillator frequency); and it wouldnot be necessary to use bandwidth on the conventional infrastructure-tagwireless link for transmission of correction coefficients.

Each tag will age at a different rate (and potentially tags will age indifferent directions: becoming faster or slower), so it will not bepossible to apply a ‘common’ correction to the base station frequencyreference that allows it to capture the UWB signal from all tagseffectively. However, in some candidate location system architectures,the base stations will know in advance the identity of the tag fromwhich they are attempting to detect a UWB signal during a particularperiod. For example, tags might be commanded to transmit UWB signals ata particular time by the infrastructure (over a separate radio link), ormight transmit their identity over a separate radio link to indicatethat they are about to transmit a UWB signal. In these cases, basestations can refer to a database holding current ageing details for thattag, and apply a correction to their frequency reference so that itmatches that expected for the tag being located (for the duration of theUWB measurement).

When the base station has corrected its frequency reference, and ismeasuring the UWB signal from the tag, it can make a new assessment ofthe offset between the tag and base station references (which should, ofcourse, be zero, if the expected correction value was exactly correctand no additional temperature or ageing drift has occurred). It can usethis new information to update (if necessary), the correction valuestored in the database.

FIG. 6 illustrates one example of this method of frequency compensation.

It is worth noting that schemes involving both of the above frequencycompensation methods (i.e. compensation at both the tag and base stationends of the UWB link) can be used.

3. Frequency Compensation Using Tags to Transfer Accurate References

The schemes discussed above involve giving base stations access torelatively low-ageing frequency references, so that any (long-term)drift between base station and tag references can be attributed directlyto ageing of the tag reference. This may be done by installing anaccurate clock at each base station or by synchronising the basestations' clocks with an accurate clock elsewhere in the network usingcommunication links between them.

It might be prohibitively expensive to equip all base stations in thelocation system with very high-quality timing sources of this type.However, tags will be moved from one area of a building to anotherduring the normal course of system operation, and in the present methodsuch mobile tags can be used as a mechanism for frequency referencetransfer.

In the present system one or more base station(s) have access to arelatively high-quality timing source. That/those base stations may bein a specific region of the coverage area of the system (say, anentrance hall). That/those base stations note and/or correct the ageingof the frequency reference in a tag passing through that area, and storethe tag identity and time of correction in a database.

If the tag was corrected then when it moves into another area of thebuilding, the base stations in that area query the database, note thefact that the tag has been recently corrected, and assume that nosignificant ageing has occurred in the intervening period. They can thenuse their precise measurements of the tag PRF to determine the degreeand direction of ageing of their local frequency reference(s). If thetag was not corrected but an offset stored in the database then the basestations in the other area can synchronise themselves to the tag butwith the offset stored in the database.

Thus, when a tag for which a record is stored in the database isdetected by a base station that does not have access through theinfrastructure side to an accurate clock it can perform compensation. Ondetecting the tag it queries the database to check the last entry ofthat tag. If there is no entry then no compensation can be performed. Ifthe entry indicates that the tag was corrected when last detected thenits frequency can be assumed to be correct, and the base station cansynchronise itself to the tag. If the offset of the tag relative to theaccurate clock was noted in the database then the base station cansynchronise itself to the tag with the offset noted in the database.

Subsequently, the system can correct the frequency references of alltags communicating with those base stations using the newly-adjusted(and relatively accurate) base station frequency reference(s). Thesetags (or the original tag) may then move to other areas of the building,and the adjustment process will continue.

When using information from a corrected tag to determine whether anupdate to a basestation frequency reference should be made, it isadvantageous to determine whether the tag has been corrected onlyrecently—otherwise, significant ageing of the tag frequency referencemay have occurred. The period within which a corrected tag may beconsidered to have a ‘good’ frequency reference for the purposes ofcorrecting the basestation frequency reference will depend on theprecise ageing characteristics of the tag frequency reference, but fortypical TCXOs and OCXOs it may be a period of days, weeks or evenmonths.

Furthermore, to ensure that a basestation frequency reference was notupdated using erroneous information from a particularly poor measurementof the current tag frequency (either by the basestation with the goodfrequency reference, or one of the basestations which subsequently sawthat tag), it would be advantageous to combine information (viaaveraging or other filtering) from multiple measurements of tagfrequency (either from a single tag or multiple tags which have beenupdated recently) before committing to an update of the basestationfrequency reference. The number of measurements which should be combinedin this way depends upon the accuracy distribution of basestationmeasurements of tag frequency, and might range anywhere from a fewmeasurements to thousands of measurements.

This scheme may use the techniques described with reference to schemes 1and 2 above. Once the base station clocks are synchronised with eachother they may communicate readily with tags that are also synchronisedto the same time-base.

This process is illustrated in FIG. 7.

4. Statistical Correction of Frequency References

To further reduce reliance on very-high-quality timing sources, use canbe made of the fact that the references used by individual tags will ageby different amounts and in different directions (i.e. faster orslower). Therefore, if a base station covers an area containing a largenumber of tags, it could be expected (on a statistical basis) that themean ageing for all tags in that area should be zero. The system canwatch the ageing over time of the set of tags in the area—the averageageing of this set should be zero, but will not be because of the ageingof the base station reference. The system can therefore deduce thedegree and direction of ageing of the base station reference, and cancorrect it appropriately. (Of course, this operation will fail tocorrect for ageing if all the tags in the area happen to age by the sameamount in the same direction, but this situation is unlikely). If thetags themselves are being corrected then the base station can make useof a database storing the times at which the tags were corrected and thecorrection applied to each one, so as to establish the overall trend ofdrift.

To get a good, statistically significant estimate of the ageing of thebasestation frequency reference, it might be necessary for a basestationto average the measured ageing of many (typically at least tens) of tagswhich are in communication with it. In a practical system in which thetags are mobile, the set of tags seen by the basestation will changeover time, as tags move around, but any tag seen by the basestation cancontribute to the running average. In certain circumstances, it might beadvantageous to restrict collection of data for the purposes ofaveraging to specific tags or a specific set of tags—for example, if abasestation takes multiple measurements of each tag frequency, and findsa strong diurnal signal due to (say) temperature changes due toinsolation, it might discount the readings for that tag from theaveraging process, on the basis that temperature effects arecontributing strongly to the measurements of that tag's currentoperating frequency.

Similarly, for a tag which is mobile, and which is seen by manydifferent base station sets (each of which has its own independentfrequency reference), the system can monitor the frequency of the tagrelative to the base stations. Because the ageing of the base stationreferences should be independent of each others' behaviour and shouldaverage to zero, the system can deduce the ageing of the tag referencefrom the computed average, and correct it appropriately. (Again, thisoperation will fail to correct for ageing if all the base stationreferences happen to age by the same amount in the same direction, butthis situation is unlikely).

The averaging would conveniently be performed by a computing means whichwas in communications with all the basestations (this might be combinedwith one of the basestations itself). Again, it might be advantageous toselect only measurements from some basestations to improve thestatistical properties of the averaged result. To get a good,statistically significant estimate of the ageing of the tag frequencyreference, it might be necessary for the computing means to average themeasured ageing of many (at least tens) of basestation references whichhave recently (in the last week, say) communicated with that tag.

Combinations of these two approaches are possible—all tag-base stationfrequency offset measurements are combined to arrive at corrections foreach tag and base station which minimise the maximum offsets between anysingle tag and single base station in the system.

These approaches do not demand that there is a high-quality frequencyreference within the system. However, it is preferable for at least oneor some of the base stations to have access to a high quality referenceclock. It is preferred that at least tag-infrastructure PRF measurementsare recorded (together with the measurement times and the identities ofthe tags and base stations involved) in a database. Information withinthat database is subsequently processed by the system to make thestatistical inferences required to correct the tag and base stationfrequency references.

The applicant hereby discloses in isolation each individual featuredescribed herein and any combination of two or more such features, tothe extent that such features or combinations are capable of beingcarried out based on the present specification as a whole in the lightof the common general knowledge of a person skilled in the art,irrespective of whether such features or combinations of features solveany problems disclosed herein, and without limitation to the scope ofthe claims. The applicant indicates that aspects of the presentinvention may consist of any such individual feature or combination offeatures. In view of the foregoing description it will be evident to aperson skilled in the art that various modifications may be made withinthe scope of the invention.

1. A communication system comprising: one or more transceiver units of afirst type; a data store accessible to the or each transceiver unit ofthe first type; two or more transceiver units of a second type, thetransceiver units of a second type being capable of communicating withthe transceiver units of the first type, and each transceiver unit ofthe second type comprising a local frequency reference unit on which thefrequency of signals transmitted by it are dependent; wherein: at leastone transceiver unit of the first type comprises a frequency comparisonunit for comparing the frequency of a signal received from a transceiverunit of the second type with a reference frequency, and a feedback datastorage unit for storing data representative of the result of thatcomparison in respect of that transceiver unit of the second type; andthe or each transceiver unit of the first type comprises a frequencyadjustment unit for adjusting the transmit and/or receive frequency ofthe transceiver unit of the first type for communication with one of thetransceiver units of the second type in accordance with feedback datastored in respect of that transceiver unit of the second type.
 2. Acommunication system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the or eachtransceiver unit of the first type is arranged to communicate with asingle one of the transceiver units of the second type at any one time.3. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, wherein eachtransceiver unit of the first type is a base station.
 4. A communicationsystem as claimed in claim 1, wherein each transceiver unit of thesecond type is an identification unit.
 5. A communication system asclaimed in claim 4, wherein each transceiver unit of the second type hasa unique identity within the system.
 6. A communication system asclaimed in claim 5, wherein each transceiver unit of the second type isa mobile transceiver.
 7. A communication system as claimed in claim 6,wherein each transceiver unit of the second type is a radio tag.
 8. Acommunication system as claimed in claim 1 wherein each transceiver unitof the second type comprises a power source.
 9. A communication systemas claimed in claim 1, wherein the system is a locationing system and iscapable of determining the location of a transceiver unit of the secondtype relative to the or each transceiver unit of the first type.
 10. Acommunication system as claimed in claim 1, wherein communicationbetween the transceiver units of the first type and the transceiverunits of the second system is by ultrawideband radio.
 11. Acommunication system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the communicationsystem is such that each transceiver unit of the second type canestablish communication with each transceiver unit of the first typeonly if the operating frequencies of those transceiver units aresynchronised to better than 2 ppm.
 12. A communication system as claimedin claim 1, wherein the or each local frequency reference unit is anoscillator and the or each frequency adjustment unit is capable ofaltering the oscillation frequency of the oscillator.
 13. Acommunication system comprising: one or more transceiver units of afirst type; two or more transceiver units of a second type, thetransceiver units of a second type being capable of communicating withthe transceiver units of the first type, and each transceiver unit ofthe second type comprising a local frequency reference unit on which thefrequency of signals transmitted by it are dependent; wherein at leastone transceiver unit of the first type comprises: a frequency comparisonunit for comparing the frequency of signals received from transceiverunits of the second type with a reference frequency and forming anoffset signal representative of the average offset between the frequencyof the received signals and the reference frequency; a frequencyadjustment unit for adjusting the reference frequency in accordance withthe offset signal.
 14. A communication system as claimed in claim 13,wherein each transceiver unit of the first type is a base station.
 15. Acommunication system as claimed in claim 13, wherein each transceiverunit of the second type is an identification unit.
 16. A communicationsystem as claimed in claim 15, wherein each transceiver unit of thesecond type has a unique identity within the system.
 17. A communicationsystem as claimed in claim 16, wherein each transceiver unit of thesecond type is a mobile transceiver.
 18. A communication system asclaimed in claim 17, wherein each transceiver unit of the second type isa radio tag.
 19. A communication system as claimed in claim 13 whereineach transceiver unit of the second type comprises a power source.
 20. Acommunication system as claimed in claim 13, wherein the system is alocationing system and is capable of determining the location of atransceiver unit of the second type relative to the or each transceiverunit of the first type.
 21. A communication system as claimed in claim13, wherein communication between the transceiver units of the firsttype and the transceiver units of the second system is by ultrawidebandradio.
 22. A communication system as claimed in claim 13, wherein thecommunication system is such that each transceiver unit of the secondtype can establish communication with each transceiver unit of the firsttype only if the operating frequencies of those transceiver units aresynchronised to better than 2 ppm.
 23. A communication system as claimedin claim 13, wherein the or each local frequency reference unit is anoscillator and the or each frequency adjustment unit is capable ofaltering the oscillation frequency of the oscillator.
 24. A method foradjusting the transmit and/or receive frequency of a transceiver unit ina communication system comprising one or more transceiver units of afirst type, the transceiver units of a second type being capable ofcommunicating with the transceiver units of the first type; the methodcomprising: comparing the frequency of a signal received by atransceiver of the first type from a transceiver unit of the second typewith a reference frequency; storing feedback data representative of theresult of that comparison in respect of that transceiver unit of thesecond type; and adjusting the transmit and/or receive frequency of thetransceiver unit of the first type for communication with one of thetransceiver units of the second type in accordance with feedback datastored in respect of that transceiver unit of the second type.
 25. Amethod for adjusting a reference frequency of a transceiver unit in acommunication system comprising one or more transceiver units of a firsttype, and two or more transceiver units of a second type, thetransceiver units of the second type being capable of communicating withthe transceiver units of the first type, each transceiver unit of thesecond type comprising a local frequency reference unit on which thefrequency of signals transmitted by it are dependent; the methodcomprising: comparing the frequency of signals received from transceiverunits of the second type with a reference frequency; forming an offsetsignal representative of the average offset between the frequency of thereceived signals and the reference frequency; and adjusting thereference frequency in accordance with the offset signal.